Does “Howl” promote the use of Drugs or does it reject it?
Throughout the text Ginsberg states that these people, “Bohemians” or “Hipsters”, would often spend their nights drinking away and abusing various substances.
“who got busted in their pubic beards returning through Laredo with a belt of marijuana for New York,
who ate fire in paint hotels or drank turpentine in Paradise Alley, death, or purgatoried their torsos night after night
with dreams, with drugs, with waking nightmares, alcohol “
It is clear that through the endless nights of fun these Bohemians would endure a certain brilliance, that is, they would dwell in deep conversation and let their imagination run freely.
“who passed through universities with radiant cool eyes hallucinating Arkansas and Blake-light tragedy among the scholars of war”
One can see this poem as an invitation of the sorts to experience all that life has to offer, to be completely free. In the poem, the depictions of these care-free bohemians go against the socially accepted construct of the mid 1950’s and Ginsberg himself even associates with their ideals and beliefs. Although, some can read it from the other way around and believe the images he portrays of this lifestyle solidifies the ideas that drug use is bad. The overall text depicts the bohemians and artists as almost Godly creatures whose creations because of their care-free lifestyle will live in the minds of millions till the end of time. Thus, do you think that “Howl” promotes the use of Drugs or does it reject it?
How is Moloch similar to the depictions of industrialization we have seen in the past?
In this interpretation of industrialization, the author gives it a name “Moloch”. He blames the destruction of creative minds and freedom to the overall industrialization and the money hungry capitalization America is known for. In class, this isn’t the first time we had to break apart industrialism and capitalism almost as a spiritual being corrupting the lives of innocent people. This being said, I wanted to add a previous novel we read, “The Jungle”, to see if the depictions of this entity that destroys all that is holy truly that bad. In the Jungle, Jurgis loses everything to the “machine” and by the end of the novel is a completely different person from his past self. And so, how is Moloch similar to the depictions of industrialization we have seen in the past?
Why do you think Ginsberg is still hopeful for humanity by the end of this?
Ginsberg leaves the reader with a hopeful outlook that although these bohemians are contained, figuratively and literally. One day they will be allowed to be free from the constraints of higher authority and overall society. While the rest of the poem he implies that Moloch will continue to reign as this omnipotent force. He sympathizes with these contained victims that were misunderstood at the foot of society. These bohemians being angelic warriors against Moloch; one day will come to find a place of tranquility. This leaves the final question, why do you think Ginsberg is still hopeful for humanity by the end of this? And do you think he was right to be hopeful for humanity?
Citation: Howl by Allen Ginsberg | Poetry Foundation