Dear All,
On March 7th, we got the chance to learn more about podcasts in a class workshop run by Sable Gravesandy and Bre Banks. Click here to view slides from their presentation.
Dear All,
On March 7th, we got the chance to learn more about podcasts in a class workshop run by Sable Gravesandy and Bre Banks. Click here to view slides from their presentation.
“The history of the American Negro is the history of this strife—this longing to attain self-conscious manhood, to merge his double self into a better and truer self. In this merging he wishes neither of the older selves to be lost. He would not Africanize America, for America has too much to teach the world and Africa. He would not bleach his Negro soul in a flood of white Americanism, for he knows that Negro blood has a message for the world. He simply wishes to make it possible for a man to be both a Negro and an American, without being cursed and spit upon by his fellows, without having the doors of Opportunity closed roughly in his face.” (Chapter 1)
Du Bois does a beautiful job throughout most of the chapters, but one piece of imagery that I thought was expunged from his mind exceptionally well was here in the first chapter. He speaks of the internal conflict at play within African Americans and their desire to just be themselves in this land and not have to eliminate any part of their character as they attempt to live a good life in America. He speaks about how he wishes for a man to be both negro and American, and not having to be spat on, both metaphorically in the sense that companies and businesses were denying their attempts at work, etc. and literally as in how rude and how rageful the hatred was for people that weren’t purely American was back then. Du Bois is seeking for a chance at equality in an unforgiving environment. Also, Du Bois paints a broad picture that further cements the idea of achieving freedom not only granted by white people but by themselves and to strive for the better. He indicates that achieving freedom from the laws in place are but only a stop along the way in this road to freedom, that there is more work to do and this delayed gratification is the true goal that they should be striving for.
Does “Howl” promote the use of Drugs or does it reject it?
Throughout the text Ginsberg states that these people, “Bohemians” or “Hipsters”, would often spend their nights drinking away and abusing various substances.
It is clear that through the endless nights of fun these Bohemians would endure a certain brilliance, that is, they would dwell in deep conversation and let their imagination run freely.
“who passed through universities with radiant cool eyes hallucinating Arkansas and Blake-light tragedy among the scholars of war”
One can see this poem as an invitation of the sorts to experience all that life has to offer, to be completely free. In the poem, the depictions of these care-free bohemians go against the socially accepted construct of the mid 1950’s and Ginsberg himself even associates with their ideals and beliefs. Although, some can read it from the other way around and believe the images he portrays of this lifestyle solidifies the ideas that drug use is bad. The overall text depicts the bohemians and artists as almost Godly creatures whose creations because of their care-free lifestyle will live in the minds of millions till the end of time. Thus, do you think that “Howl” promotes the use of Drugs or does it reject it?
How is Moloch similar to the depictions of industrialization we have seen in the past?
In this interpretation of industrialization, the author gives it a name “Moloch”. He blames the destruction of creative minds and freedom to the overall industrialization and the money hungry capitalization America is known for. In class, this isn’t the first time we had to break apart industrialism and capitalism almost as a spiritual being corrupting the lives of innocent people. This being said, I wanted to add a previous novel we read, “The Jungle”, to see if the depictions of this entity that destroys all that is holy truly that bad. In the Jungle, Jurgis loses everything to the “machine” and by the end of the novel is a completely different person from his past self. And so, how is Moloch similar to the depictions of industrialization we have seen in the past?
Why do you think Ginsberg is still hopeful for humanity by the end of this?
Ginsberg leaves the reader with a hopeful outlook that although these bohemians are contained, figuratively and literally. One day they will be allowed to be free from the constraints of higher authority and overall society. While the rest of the poem he implies that Moloch will continue to reign as this omnipotent force. He sympathizes with these contained victims that were misunderstood at the foot of society. These bohemians being angelic warriors against Moloch; one day will come to find a place of tranquility. This leaves the final question, why do you think Ginsberg is still hopeful for humanity by the end of this? And do you think he was right to be hopeful for humanity?
The Souls of Black Folk by WEB Du Bois was written as a wake up call for African Americans living with the struggles and dangers that arose in a Post Civil War America, to get them to fight back and demand more change for the sake of their future. His words were that of inspiration, as in the reconstruction period of America there was a great rise in hate groups like the KKK, as well as lynching. It was a tumultuous time as even though African Americans were promised and held to to this hope of Freedom with the abolishment of Slavery, the world showed them otherwise. As he said himself, “We have no right to sit silently by while the inevitable seeds are sown for a harvest of disaster to our children, black and white.” This sentence encapsulates the thoughts that many African Americans had sat with and thought about, and lines like this were designed to get them to see the situation their in an essentially challenged them to change it.
The Jungle, written by Upton Sinclair is based in the early 20th century in Chicago. It depicts the harsh realities and conditions that many immigrant workers had to deal with in coming over to America. It talks about the journey of Jurgis Rudkus who came over with his family from Lithuania to America. They moved to a town called Packing Town in Chicago, I think the depiction of the city is the biggest cultural resource used. The vibe and environment of the city encapsulates what life was like in the 20th century. The conditions that the men faced in those meat packing factories was something that very few people knew about, and the ones who did, didn’t feel bothered to do anything about it. It sheds a strong light on the health and safety of workers and how poorly they were treated. More importantly, I feel, it talks about the experiences and trials that immigrants had to face, deconstructing the false hoods of the American Dream and painting a grimmer and more harsh truth.
Du Bois uses imagery to evoke powerful emotions and convey the experiences of Black people in America. For example, he uses imagery to describe the horrors of lynching, the beauty of Black spirituals, and the despair of poverty. Through this imagery, Du Bois helps the reader understand the complexity of the Black experience and the struggle for freedom. One of the most striking examples of Du Bois’s use of imagery can be found in his description of the “Veil” that separates black people from white people. He uses the image of a veil to describe the social and cultural barriers that exist between the races. He writes, “The Negro is a sort of seventh son, born with a veil, and gifted with second-sight in this American world,—a world which yields him no true self-consciousness, but only lets him see himself through the revelation of the other world.” Du Bois’s use of the image of a veil conveys the idea that African Americans are hidden from white society, and that they are prevented from fully experiencing the benefits of American democracy. The veil also suggests that African Americans are seen as inferior, and that they are subject to the prejudices and stereotypes of white society.
Another example of Du Bois’s use of imagery can be found in his description of the landscape of the rural South. He uses vivid and detailed descriptions to convey the harsh realities of life for African Americans in this region. He writes, “Through the hot, dragging hours of the day, the little groups of shade under the trees moved with their baskets and pails to the watering-troughs and back again; at nightfall the gangs came in, and in the firefly-lit darkness tent and shanty gleamed weirdly here and there.” Du Bois’s use of imagery in this passage conveys the hard labor and poverty that African Americans experienced in the rural South. The image of the fireflies suggests that despite their struggles, there is still beauty to be found in their lives.
The Jungle by Upton Sinclair is a novel that was first published in 1906. It is a powerful depiction of the harsh realities of immigrant life in the early 20th century. The book follows the life of Jurgis Rudkus, a Lithuanian immigrant who comes to Chicago with his family seeking a better life. However, he soon discovers that life in the United States is not as he had imagined, and he faces poverty, exploitation, and injustice.
One of the ways in which The Jungle uses cultural and historical resources is by drawing upon the experiences of real-life immigrants who came to the United States during the early 20th century. Sinclair spent several weeks in Chicago’s stockyards, where he conducted interviews with workers and observed the conditions in which they worked. He also drew upon the experiences of his own family, who were Lithuanian immigrants, to create an authentic portrayal of the immigrant experience. In addition, The Jungle makes use of historical resources to create a vivid picture of the social and political context in which the story takes place. The book was written during a period of significant social and economic change in the United States, and Sinclair used this context to highlight the injustices of a capitalist society. The novel illustrates the exploitation of workers, the corruption of politicians and business owners, and the brutal conditions of the meatpacking industry. Sinclair’s portrayal of these issues drew upon historical sources, such as the reports of journalists and social reformers who had investigated the meatpacking industry.
The Jungle uses cultural resources to illustrate the immigrant experience and the challenges that immigrants faced when coming to the United States. The novel explores the tensions between different immigrant groups, as well as the difficulties of adapting to a new culture and language. It also touches on issues such as the role of religion in immigrant communities and the importance of family ties.



Leonardo Dicaprio

Anne Hathaway
For this masterpiece in the making, I believe that I would choose Leonardo Dicaprio and Anne Hathaway to play the roles of Jurgis and Ona, solely on how versatile and powerful these two are in their portrayals on the big screen. Leo might not fit the description for Jurgis, probably a bigger or stronger actor would suffice but Leo is exceptional in his own right, so much so that he would nail everything besides the physique. Hathaway has tremendous range in the characters she can pull out of her bag, she somewhat fits Ona’s description but I am recruiting based on performance potential so there! Sinclair described Jurgis as an absolute unit and a kind of dumb but loyal and hard working provider, Leo could pull that off no problem, he would have to bulk up but I think he’d be perfect for the role. Ona is described to be a petite housewife basically, soft on the eyes but supportive. It’s scary how many personalities Hathaway can portray and I don’t think Ona would be too hard for her to nail.
Jurgis and Ona are two integral characters in The Jungle by Upton Sinclair. Therefore, should they require an actor and actress for these pivotal roles, I would cast Arnold Schwarzenegger as Jurgis because of his bodybuilder stature and Natalie Portman because of her petite frame. As we witness the role of Jurgis in the novel and how he is described by Sinclair, an actor like Arnold fits perfectly. Jurgis is described as a big and strappid man who is shy at functions and socially awkward. I think Arnold would be a great actor because he too is from Europe and began his journey to America as a young man seeking the American Dream. Natalie Portman, was also born outside of the United States. Born in Jerusalem, she moved to America at the age of seven. My first recollection of Portman was when she starred in her first movie Léon: The Professional alongside Jean Reno. Portman embodied the role of a young girl whose family was murdered by corrupt DEA agents. I think she fits the role of Ona because of her sense of vulnerability in the moments after witnessing the death of her family members. These actors/actresses both show great potential for being cast as the protagonists of the Jungle. Therein, my idea of the film adaption of the book would center around poverty, violence, and unprotected environments. Sinclair states, “The rich people not only had all the money, they had all the chance to get more; they had all the know-ledge and the power, and so the poor man was down, and he had to stay down.” (Sinclair, 2021, p. 40). Lines like these represent the struggle and adversity the characters in the book faced. Schwarzenegger and Portman would be great choices to reflect these characters when set against an urban landscape like the Chicago meatpacking district. The film should be raw—no pun intended—and vibrantly express the challenges each character faced in the most visceral way possible.
